Recently, a “legal alert” was released by FordHarrison, a major U.S. law, which focuses on labor and employment law.
 
The alert concerned a settlement with a large contract cleaning company and a major retail department store chain.  In this case, the department store hired the contract cleaning company to provide janitorial services for its stores throughout California. To service these outlets, the cleaning contractor subcontracted the work to a network of local janitorial subcontractors.
 
The subcontractors filed a class action lawsuit against the contractor as well as the department store. They claimed they were not paid sufficient funds to allow the subcontractors to comply with applicable local, state, and federal laws such as meeting minimum wage requirements, employment taxes, etc.  They also claimed that both the contractor and the department store “knew or should have known” that the funds (payments to the subcontractors) would be insufficient.
 
The case proceeded through the California courts which ultimately agreed with the subcontractors and required both the contractor and the department store to pay $2.3 million to settle the case.
 
While this occurred in California, contractor-subcontractor relationships similar to this are occurring and have occurred in many areas of the U.S.
 
According to Terry Sambrowski, executive director of the National Service Alliance (NSA), a group purchasing organization for larger building service contractors and related businesses in the United States, both contractors and their customers can learn from this case.
 
“There must be a level of transparency so that all parties – the customer, the lead contractor, and the subcontractor – are sure they are in compliance with all federal and state employment regulations. That will help prevent situations like this from occurring and be healthier for the professional cleaning industry overall.”